Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz is newer than Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 @ 2.80GHz and is around -13% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz is around -8% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1473 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 @ 2.80GHz | ×Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | PGA478 | BGA479 | |
| CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
| Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
| TDP | 44W | 25W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $8.03 | $4.56 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2009 | Q1 2009 | |
| # of Samples | 73 | 1400 | |
| CPU Rank | 4335 | 4507 | |
| CPU Value | 2.7 | 11.4 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1101(0.0%) | 10163(-7.7%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1108(0.0%) | 966(-12.8%) |
| Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 @ 2.80GHz | 1,108 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz | 966 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 @ 2.80GHz | 2.7 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz | 11.4 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 @ 2.80GHz | 1,101 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz | 1,016 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 @ 2.80GHz | Intel Core2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 44W | 25W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |