Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Athlon II Dual-Core M320 is newer than Celeron Dual-Core T3100 @ 1.90GHz and is around 23% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD Athlon II Dual-Core M320 is around 29% faster in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 388 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×AMD Athlon II Dual-Core M320 | ×Celeron Dual-Core T3100 @ 1.90GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | NA2 | BGA479 | |
| CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
| Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
| TDP | 35W | 35W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $6.39 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2009 | Q4 2009 | |
| # of Samples | 242 | 146 | |
| CPU Rank | 4721 | 4914 | |
| CPU Value | 25.7 | 17.5 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 8563(0.0%) | 6623(-22.6%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 770(0.0%) | 625(-18.8%) |
| AMD Athlon II Dual-Core M320 | 770 | |
| Celeron Dual-Core T3100 @ 1.90GHz | 625 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| AMD Athlon II Dual-Core M320 | 25.7 | |
| Celeron Dual-Core T3100 @ 1.90GHz | 17.5 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| AMD Athlon II Dual-Core M320 | 856 | |
| Celeron Dual-Core T3100 @ 1.90GHz | 662 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| AMD Athlon II Dual-Core M320 | Celeron Dual-Core T3100 @ 1.90GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 35W | 35W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |