Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2690 @ 2.90GHz and is around 7% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz is around 28% faster in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 2096 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2690 @ 2.90GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA2011 | LGA2011-v3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.8 GHz | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 6 (Threads: 12) | |
| Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 15MB | |
| TDP | 135W | 140W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $24.64 | $25.55 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2012 | Q4 2014 | |
| # of Samples | 747 | 1349 | |
| CPU Rank | 1615 | 1553 | |
| CPU Value | 5.2 | 7.3 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1657(-21.9%) | 2122(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 9735(-6.2%) | 10378(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2690 @ 2.90GHz | 9,735 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz | 10,378 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2690 @ 2.90GHz | 5.2 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz | 7.3 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2690 @ 2.90GHz | 1,657 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz | 2,122 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2690 @ 2.90GHz | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 135W | 140W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |