Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz is newer than Intel Xeon X5667 @ 3.07GHz and is around 38% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz is around 37% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz uses around 31% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1306 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon X5667 @ 3.07GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA1366 | FCLGA2011 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 3.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.5 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 8) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
| Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 12MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | |
| TDP | 95W | 130W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $23.73 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2010 | Q3 2013 | |
| # of Samples | 31 | 1275 | |
| CPU Rank | 2458 | 2063 | |
| CPU Value | 260.4 | 21.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1469(-26.9%) | 2010(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 4697(-27.7%) | 6494(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon X5667 @ 3.07GHz | 4,697 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz | 6,494 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon X5667 @ 3.07GHz | 260.4 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz | 21.0 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon X5667 @ 3.07GHz | 1,469 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz | 2,010 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon X5667 @ 3.07GHz | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 95W | 130W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |