Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 @ 2.00GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz and is around 31% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. However the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 377 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 @ 2.00GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA2011 | LGA2011-v3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.3 GHz | Up to 3.0 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 14 (Threads: 28) | |
| Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 896KB, L2: 3.5MB, L3: 35MB | |
| TDP | 115W | 120W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $20.99 | $21.90 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2014 | Q1 2015 | |
| # of Samples | 174 | 203 | |
| CPU Rank | 1476 | 1217 | |
| CPU Value | 59.4 | 77.8 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1623(-2.6%) | 1665(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 11277(-23.7%) | 14778(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz | 11,277 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 @ 2.00GHz | 14,778 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz | 59.4 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 @ 2.00GHz | 77.8 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz | 1,623 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 @ 2.00GHz | 1,665 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 @ 2.50GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 @ 2.00GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 115W | 120W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |