Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-1607 v4 @ 3.10GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 @ 2.50GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-1607 v4 @ 3.10GHz is around 47% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 @ 2.50GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 72 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 @ 2.50GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-1607 v4 @ 3.10GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA 2011 | FCLGA2011-3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
| # of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
| Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | |
| TDP | 80W | 140W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $14.60 | $25.55 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2014 | Q4 2016 | |
| # of Samples | 31 | 41 | |
| CPU Rank | 2856 | 2344 | |
| CPU Value | 43.6 | 29.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1311(-31.9%) | 1925(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3339(-35.4%) | 5171(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 @ 2.50GHz | 3,339 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1607 v4 @ 3.10GHz | 5,171 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 @ 2.50GHz | 43.6 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1607 v4 @ 3.10GHz | 29.0 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 @ 2.50GHz | 1,311 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1607 v4 @ 3.10GHz | 1,925 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 @ 2.50GHz | Intel Xeon E5-1607 v4 @ 3.10GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 80W | 140W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |