Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 @ 2.30GHz and is around 14% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 531 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 @ 2.30GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA2011-v3 | LGA2011-v3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 3.6 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 32) | 18 (Threads: 36) | |
| Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 40MB | L1: 1,152KB, L2: 4.5MB, L3: 45MB | |
| TDP | 135W | 145W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $24.64 | $26.46 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2014 | Q2 2015 | |
| # of Samples | 197 | 334 | |
| CPU Value | 2.1 | 39.2 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1937(-5.6%) | 2052(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 18836(-12.1%) | 21436(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 @ 2.30GHz | 18,836 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz | 21,436 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 @ 2.30GHz | 2.1 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz | 39.2 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 @ 2.30GHz | 1,937 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz | 2,052 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 @ 2.30GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 135W | 145W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |