Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz is newer than AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core is around 17% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 2440 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz | ×AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
$49 - BUY
| |
| Socket Type | LGA1150 | AM3+ | |
| CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clockspeed | 3.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 4) | 4 (in 2 physical modules) | |
| Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 3MB | L1: 320KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 4MB | |
| TDP | 35W | 95W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $17.34 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2014 | Q4 2012 | |
| # of Samples | 222 | 2218 | |
| CPU Rank | 2930 | 2979 | |
| CPU Value | 51.5 | 61.1 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1727(0.0%) | 1477(-14.5%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3088(0.0%) | 2995(-3.0%) |
| Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz | 3,088 | |
| AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core | 2,995 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz | 51.5 | |
| AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core | 61.1 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz | 1,727 | |
| AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core | 1,477 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core i3-4160T @ 3.10GHz | AMD FX-4300 Quad-Core | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 35W | 95W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |