Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 @ 1.90GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz and is around -38% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 @ 1.90GHz is around -41% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz uses around 31% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 493 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 @ 1.90GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA 1356 | LGA 2011 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 1.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 2.4 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
| Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 25MB | |
| TDP | 95W | 130W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $23.73 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2014 | Q1 2014 | |
| # of Samples | 8 | 485 | |
| CPU Rank | 1843 | 1412 | |
| CPU Value | 58.2 | 48.7 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1179(-41.3%) | 2009(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 7565(-37.8%) | 12164(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 @ 1.90GHz | 7,565 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz | 12,164 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 @ 1.90GHz | 58.2 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz | 48.7 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 @ 1.90GHz | 1,179 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz | 2,009 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2440 v2 @ 1.90GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 95W | 130W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |