Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3 @ 3.00GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz and is around -12% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3 @ 3.00GHz is around 11% faster in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 936 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3 @ 3.00GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
$201.21 - BUY
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA2011-v3 | FCLGA2011 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.5 GHz | Up to 3.5 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 12 (Threads: 24) | |
| Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 768KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 30MB | |
| TDP | 140W | 130W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $25.55 | $23.73 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2014 | Q2 2013 | |
| # of Samples | 134 | 802 | |
| CPU Value | 62.5 | 73.7 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1985(0.0%) | 1784(-10.1%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 12582(-11.7%) | 14256(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3 @ 3.00GHz | 12,582 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz | 14,256 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3 @ 3.00GHz | 62.5 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz | 73.7 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3 @ 3.00GHz | 1,985 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz | 1,784 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3 @ 3.00GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 140W | 130W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |