Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-1650 @ 3.20GHz and is around -18% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz is around -20% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1111 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-1650 @ 3.20GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
$146.47 - BUY
| |
| Socket Type | LGA 2011 | LGA2011 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 2.8 GHz | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 6 (Threads: 12) | 6 (Threads: 12) | |
| Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 15MB | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 12MB | |
| TDP | 60W | 130W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $10.95 | $23.73 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2014 | Q2 2012 | |
| # of Samples | 20 | 1091 | |
| CPU Value | 44.3 | 55.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1385(-19.8%) | 1727(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 6640(-17.6%) | 8055(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz | 6,640 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 @ 3.20GHz | 8,055 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz | 44.3 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 @ 3.20GHz | 55.0 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz | 1,385 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-1650 @ 3.20GHz | 1,727 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz | Intel Xeon E5-1650 @ 3.20GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 60W | 130W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |