Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz and is around 47% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 40 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA2011-v3 | FCLGA2011-3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 1.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 2.5 GHz | Up to 2.9 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 24) | 18 (Threads: 36) | |
| Cache | L1: 768KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 30MB | L1: 1,152KB, L2: 4.5MB, L3: 45MB | |
| TDP | 65W | 135W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $24.64 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2015 | Q4 2015 | |
| # of Samples | 35 | 5 | |
| CPU Rank | 1429 | 1083 | |
| CPU Value | 5.3 | 3.2 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1392(-5.6%) | 1474(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 11865(-31.9%) | 17430(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz | 11,865 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz | 17,430 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz | 5.3 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz | 3.2 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz | 1,392 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz | 1,474 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3 @ 1.80GHz | Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 65W | 135W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |