Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-4620 @ 2.20GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. It is also significantly faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz uses around 23% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 2237 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-4620 @ 2.20GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA 2011 | FCLGA2011-3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 2.6 GHz | Up to 3.3 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 14 (Threads: 28) | |
| Cache | L1: 64KB, L2: 0.3MB, L3: 16MB | L1: 896KB, L2: 3.5MB, L3: 35MB | |
| TDP | 95W | 120W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $21.90 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2015 | Q2 2016 | |
| # of Samples | 7 | 2230 | |
| CPU Rank | 2012 | 1093 | |
| CPU Value | 112.9 | 81.3 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1154(-40.3%) | 1931(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 6635(-61.5%) | 17233(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-4620 @ 2.20GHz | 6,635 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz | 17,233 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-4620 @ 2.20GHz | 112.9 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz | 81.3 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-4620 @ 2.20GHz | 1,154 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz | 1,931 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-4620 @ 2.20GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 95W | 120W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |