Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD PRO A10-9700E is newer than Intel Core i3-3250T @ 3.00GHz and is around 16% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD PRO A10-9700E is around -14% slower in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 87 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core i3-3250T @ 3.00GHz | ×AMD PRO A10-9700E | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA1155 | AM4 | |
| CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.5 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 4) | 4 (in 2 physical modules) | |
| Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 3MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 4.0MB, | |
| TDP | 35W | 35W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $6.39 | |
| Other | R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G | ||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2016 | Q3 2016 | |
| # of Samples | 4 | 83 | |
| CPU Rank | 3199 | 3001 | |
| CPU Value | 0.0 | 22.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1684(0.0%) | 1449(-13.9%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2650(-13.4%) | 3061(0.0%) |
| Intel Core i3-3250T @ 3.00GHz | 2,650 | |
| AMD PRO A10-9700E | 3,061 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core i3-3250T @ 3.00GHz | NA | |
| AMD PRO A10-9700E | 22.0 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core i3-3250T @ 3.00GHz | 1,684 | |
| AMD PRO A10-9700E | 1,449 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core i3-3250T @ 3.00GHz | AMD PRO A10-9700E | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 35W | 35W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |