Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4 @ 3.10GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 2.40GHz and is around 37% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4 @ 3.10GHz is around 17% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 2.40GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 342 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 2.40GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4 @ 3.10GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA2011-3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.4 GHz | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 10 (Threads: 20) | |
| Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 25MB | |
| TDP | 90W | 165W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $16.43 | $30.11 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2016 | Q3 2016 | |
| # of Samples | 301 | 41 | |
| CPU Rank | 1408 | 1112 | |
| CPU Value | 312.5 | 0.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1981(-14.3%) | 2312(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 12468(-27.1%) | 17100(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 2.40GHz | 12,468 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4 @ 3.10GHz | 17,100 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 2.40GHz | 312.5 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4 @ 3.10GHz | NA | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 2.40GHz | 1,981 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4 @ 3.10GHz | 2,312 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 2.40GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2689 v4 @ 3.10GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 90W | 165W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |