Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2 @ 2.20GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 @ 1.80GHz and is around 23% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2 @ 2.20GHz is around 22% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2 @ 2.20GHz uses around 42% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 4 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2 @ 2.20GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 @ 1.80GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA 2011 | LGA2011-v3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | NA2 | Up to 2.5 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 24) | 12 (Threads: 24) | |
| Cache | L1: 768KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 30MB | L1: 768KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 30MB | |
| TDP | 115W | 75W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $20.99 | $13.69 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2016 | Q2 2016 | |
| # of Samples | 1 | 3 | |
| CPU Rank | 1413 | 1587 | |
| CPU Value | 0.0 | 16.4 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1571(0.0%) | 1292(-17.7%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 12119(0.0%) | 9847(-18.7%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2 @ 2.20GHz | 12,119 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 @ 1.80GHz | 9,847 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2 @ 2.20GHz | NA | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 @ 1.80GHz | 16.4 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2 @ 2.20GHz | 1,571 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 @ 1.80GHz | 1,292 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2692 v2 @ 2.20GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2648L v3 @ 1.80GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 115W | 75W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |