Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v2 @ 3.30GHz and is around -25% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz is around -20% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2673 v2 @ 3.30GHz uses around 26% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 223 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2673 v2 @ 3.30GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA2011-3 | LGA 2011 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.0 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
| Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 25MB | |
| TDP | 85W | 110W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $15.51 | $20.08 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2016 | Q2 2016 | |
| # of Samples | 212 | 11 | |
| CPU Rank | 1651 | 1405 | |
| CPU Value | 167.8 | 0.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1623(-19.8%) | 2025(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 9227(-25.0%) | 12306(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz | 9,227 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2673 v2 @ 3.30GHz | 12,306 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz | 167.8 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2673 v2 @ 3.30GHz | NA | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz | 1,623 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2673 v2 @ 3.30GHz | 2,025 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2673 v2 @ 3.30GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 85W | 110W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |