Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz and is around 9% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10GHz is around -6% slower in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1984 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
$211.95 - BUY
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA2011-3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.3 GHz | Up to 3.3 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 18 (Threads: 36) | 14 (Threads: 28) | |
| Cache | L1: 1,152KB, L2: 4.5MB, L3: 45MB | L1: 896KB, L2: 3.5MB, L3: 35MB | |
| TDP | 120W | 120W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $21.90 | $21.90 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2016 | Q2 2016 | |
| # of Samples | 62 | 1922 | |
| CPU Value | 3.0 | 81.7 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1811(-6.3%) | 1934(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 18840(0.0%) | 17312(-8.1%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10GHz | 18,840 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz | 17,312 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10GHz | 3.0 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz | 81.7 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10GHz | 1,811 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz | 1,934 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4 @ 2.10GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 120W | 120W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |