Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X is newer than Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X is around 19% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 3374 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | ×AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA1151 | AM4 | |
| CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 6 (Threads: 12) | |
| Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | L1: 576KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 16MB | |
| TDP | 51W | 95W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $9.31 | $17.34 | |
| Other | Intel HD Graphics 610 | ||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2017 | Q2 2017 | |
| # of Samples | 11 | 3363 | |
| CPU Rank | 3377 | 1354 | |
| CPU Value | 16.3 | 132.8 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1842(-15.9%) | 2191(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 2336(-82.0%) | 13009(0.0%) |
| Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | 2,336 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | 13,009 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | 16.3 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | 132.8 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | 1,842 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | 2,191 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Celeron G3950 @ 3.00GHz | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 51W | 95W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |