Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7662 is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. However the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. Also, AMD EPYC 7662 uses around 40% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 20 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7662 | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
$1179.91 - BUY
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.7 GHz | Up to 3.3 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 64 (Threads: 128) | |
| Cache | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 24.0MB, L3: 33MB | L1: 4,096KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
| TDP | 150W | 225W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $41.06 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2017 | Q2 2021 | |
| # of Samples | 12 | 8 | |
| CPU Value | 24.6 | 15.8 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2063(-1.8%) | 2102(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 28989(-59.9%) | 72298(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 28,989 | |
| AMD EPYC 7662 | 72,298 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 24.6 | |
| AMD EPYC 7662 | 15.8 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 2,063 | |
| AMD EPYC 7662 | 2,102 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | AMD EPYC 7662 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 150W | 225W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |