Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9174F is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. It is also significantly faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 37 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9174F | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP5 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.7 GHz | Up to 4.4 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
| Cache | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 24.0MB, L3: 33MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
| TDP | 150W | 320W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $58.40 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2017 | Q2 2023 | |
| # of Samples | 14 | 23 | |
| CPU Rank | 524 | 211 | |
| CPU Value | 24.9 | 23.4 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2066(-36.0%) | 3227(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 29419(-44.7%) | 53172(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 29,419 | |
| AMD EPYC 9174F | 53,172 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 24.9 | |
| AMD EPYC 9174F | 23.4 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 2,066 | |
| AMD EPYC 9174F | 3,227 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | AMD EPYC 9174F | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 150W | 320W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |