Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz is newer than AMD Phenom II N950 Quad-Core and is around 8% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. It is also significantly faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 150 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | ×AMD Phenom II N950 Quad-Core | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCBGA1356 | S1 | |
| CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
| Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, | |
| TDP | 15W | 35W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $2.74 | $6.39 | |
| Other | Intel HD Graphics 610 | ||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2017 | Q4 2010 | |
| # of Samples | 49 | 101 | |
| CPU Rank | 3750 | 3837 | |
| CPU Value | 16.4 | 14.4 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1338(0.0%) | 861(-35.7%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1753(0.0%) | 1616(-7.8%) |
| Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | 1,753 | |
| AMD Phenom II N950 Quad-Core | 1,616 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | 16.4 | |
| AMD Phenom II N950 Quad-Core | 14.4 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | 1,338 | |
| AMD Phenom II N950 Quad-Core | 861 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | AMD Phenom II N950 Quad-Core | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 15W | 35W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |