Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9175F is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. It is also significantly faster in single-thread testing. Also, AMD EPYC 9175F uses around 44% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 5 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9175F | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP5 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.8 GHz | Up to 5.0 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 28 (Threads: 56) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
| Cache | L1: 1,792KB, L2: 28.0MB, L3: 39MB | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 512MB | |
| TDP | 205W | 320W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $58.40 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2018 | Q1 2025 | |
| # of Samples | 2 | 3 | |
| CPU Value | 16.2 | 15.5 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2142(-49.6%) | 4250(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 38259(-41.9%) | 65894(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | 38,259 | |
| AMD EPYC 9175F | 65,894 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | 16.2 | |
| AMD EPYC 9175F | 15.5 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | 2,142 | |
| AMD EPYC 9175F | 4,250 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | AMD EPYC 9175F | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 205W | 320W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |