Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz is newer than Intel Core2 Duo T9500 @ 2.60GHz and is around 18% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz is around -15% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 286 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz | ×Intel Core2 Duo T9500 @ 2.60GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCBGA1515 | BGA479 | |
| CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clockspeed | 1.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
| Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
| TDP | 6W | 35W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $1.10 | $6.39 | |
| Other | Intel HD Graphics 615 | ||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2018 | Q1 2009 | |
| # of Samples | 12 | 274 | |
| CPU Value | 11.2 | 9.5 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 888(-14.9%) | 10443(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1201(0.0%) | 1022(-14.9%) |
| Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz | 1,201 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo T9500 @ 2.60GHz | 1,022 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz | 11.2 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo T9500 @ 2.60GHz | 9.5 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz | 888 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo T9500 @ 2.60GHz | 1,044 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Celeron 3965Y @ 1.50GHz | Intel Core2 Duo T9500 @ 2.60GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 6W | 35W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |