Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz is newer than Intel Core i9-9900X @ 3.50GHz and is around -25% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz is around 13% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 2395 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core i9-9900X @ 3.50GHz | ×Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$340 - BUY
![]() |
$298.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2066 | FCLGA1200 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.5 GHz | Up to 4.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 10.0MB, L3: 19MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 16MB | |
TDP | 165W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $30.11 | $11.86 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2018 | Q3 2020 | |
# of Samples | 288 | 2107 | |
CPU Value | 63.8 | 54.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2547(-11.4%) | 2873(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 21677(0.0%) | 16259(-25.0%) |
Intel Core i9-9900X @ 3.50GHz | 21,677 | |
Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | 16,259 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-9900X @ 3.50GHz | 63.8 | |
Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | 54.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-9900X @ 3.50GHz | 2,547 | |
Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | 2,873 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-9900X @ 3.50GHz | Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 165W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |