Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F32 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6248 @ 2.50GHz and is around -23% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. However the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. Also, AMD EPYC 7F32 uses around 18% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 20 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6248 @ 2.50GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F32 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$192 - BUY
![]() |
$199.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 20 (Threads: 40) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 28MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 150W | 180W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $32.85 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2019 | Q4 2020 | |
# of Samples | 13 | 7 | |
CPU Value | 156.0 | 115.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2278(-2.9%) | 2347(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 29944(0.0%) | 23142(-22.7%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248 @ 2.50GHz | 29,944 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 23,142 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248 @ 2.50GHz | 156.0 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 115.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248 @ 2.50GHz | 2,278 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 2,347 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6248 @ 2.50GHz | AMD EPYC 7F32 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 150W | 180W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |