Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9374F is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. It is also significantly faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 30 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9374F | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP5 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 4.3 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
| Cache | L1: 768KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 36MB | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
| TDP | 165W | 320W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $30.11 | $58.40 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2019 | Q1 2023 | |
| # of Samples | 11 | 19 | |
| CPU Rank | 521 | 78 | |
| CPU Value | 18.4 | 15.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1962(-37.4%) | 3135(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 30162(-63.2%) | 82009(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | 30,162 | |
| AMD EPYC 9374F | 82,009 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | 18.4 | |
| AMD EPYC 9374F | 15.0 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | 1,962 | |
| AMD EPYC 9374F | 3,135 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 @ 2.40GHz | AMD EPYC 9374F | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 165W | 320W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |