Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 3251 is newer than Intel Xeon Silver 4214 @ 2.20GHz and is around -15% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD EPYC 3251 is around 7% faster in single-thread testing. Also, AMD EPYC 3251 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 41 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD EPYC 3251 | ×Intel Xeon Silver 4214 @ 2.20GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP4r2 | FCLGA3647 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.1 GHz | Up to 3.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 12 (Threads: 24) | |
Cache | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | L1: 768KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 17MB | |
TDP | 50W | 85W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $9.13 | $15.51 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2019 | Q3 2019 | |
# of Samples | 16 | 25 | |
CPU Value | 44.2 | 60.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1881(0.0%) | 1765(-6.2%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 13912(-14.8%) | 16320(0.0%) |
AMD EPYC 3251 | 13,912 | |
Intel Xeon Silver 4214 @ 2.20GHz | 16,320 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 3251 | 44.2 | |
Intel Xeon Silver 4214 @ 2.20GHz | 60.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 3251 | 1,881 | |
Intel Xeon Silver 4214 @ 2.20GHz | 1,765 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 3251 | Intel Xeon Silver 4214 @ 2.20GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 50W | 85W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |