Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F72 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6240 @ 2.60GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD EPYC 7F72 is around 21% faster in single-thread testing. Also, AMD EPYC 7F72 uses around 46% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 22 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon Gold 6240 @ 2.60GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F72 | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 18 (Threads: 36) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
| Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 192MB | |
| TDP | 150W | 240W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $43.80 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2019 | Q3 2020 | |
| # of Samples | 11 | 11 | |
| CPU Rank | 637 | 220 | |
| CPU Value | 60.7 | 56.3 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1969(-17.5%) | 2387(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 26406(-50.0%) | 52840(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6240 @ 2.60GHz | 26,406 | |
| AMD EPYC 7F72 | 52,840 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6240 @ 2.60GHz | 60.7 | |
| AMD EPYC 7F72 | 56.3 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6240 @ 2.60GHz | 1,969 | |
| AMD EPYC 7F72 | 2,387 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6240 @ 2.60GHz | AMD EPYC 7F72 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 150W | 240W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |