Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F52 is newer than Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz however both CPUs have comparable multi-threaded (CPU Mark) and single-thread rating. Also, AMD EPYC 7F52 uses around 16% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 44 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F52 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.4 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 28 (Threads: 56) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,792KB, L2: 28.0MB, L3: 39MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 205W | 240W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $43.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2020 | Q2 2020 | |
# of Samples | 29 | 15 | |
CPU Value | 5.4 | 21.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2677(0.0%) | 2507(-6.3%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 40465(-2.1%) | 41322(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz | 40,465 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 41,322 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz | 5.4 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 21.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz | 2,677 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 2,507 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz | AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 205W | 240W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |