Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i5-9300HF @ 2.40GHz is newer than Intel Core i5-10310U @ 1.70GHz and is around 23% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core i5-9300HF @ 2.40GHz is around 8% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core i5-10310U @ 1.70GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 3381 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core i5-10310U @ 1.70GHz | ×Intel Core i5-9300HF @ 2.40GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1440 | |
| CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clockspeed | 1.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 4.4 GHz | Up to 4.1 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 8) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
| Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 6MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
| TDP | 15W | 45W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $2.74 | $8.21 | |
| Other | Intel UHD Graphics | ||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2020 | Q2 2020 | |
| # of Samples | 3032 | 349 | |
| CPU Rank | 2183 | 1914 | |
| CPU Value | 19.9 | 29.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2103(-7.1%) | 2264(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 5895(-18.7%) | 7248(0.0%) |
| Intel Core i5-10310U @ 1.70GHz | 5,895 | |
| Intel Core i5-9300HF @ 2.40GHz | 7,248 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core i5-10310U @ 1.70GHz | 19.9 | |
| Intel Core i5-9300HF @ 2.40GHz | 29.0 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core i5-10310U @ 1.70GHz | 2,103 | |
| Intel Core i5-9300HF @ 2.40GHz | 2,264 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core i5-10310U @ 1.70GHz | Intel Core i5-9300HF @ 2.40GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 15W | 45W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |