Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i9-11900F @ 2.50GHz is newer than Intel Core i9-10900 @ 2.80GHz and is around 15% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core i9-11900F @ 2.50GHz is around 14% faster in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1484 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core i9-10900 @ 2.80GHz | ×Intel Core i9-11900F @ 2.50GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
$399 - BUY
|
$760.42 - BUY
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1200 | |
| CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 5.2 GHz | Up to 5.2 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
| Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 640KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 16MB | |
| TDP | 65W | 65W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $11.86 | |
| Other | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2020 | Q2 2021 | |
| # of Samples | 1046 | 438 | |
| CPU Value | 48.0 | 29.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2995(-12.3%) | 3413(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 19172(-13.0%) | 22039(0.0%) |
| Intel Core i9-10900 @ 2.80GHz | 19,172 | |
| Intel Core i9-11900F @ 2.50GHz | 22,039 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Core i9-10900 @ 2.80GHz | 48.0 | |
| Intel Core i9-11900F @ 2.50GHz | 29.0 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Core i9-10900 @ 2.80GHz | 2,995 | |
| Intel Core i9-11900F @ 2.50GHz | 3,413 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Core i9-10900 @ 2.80GHz | Intel Core i9-11900F @ 2.50GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 65W | 65W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |