Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9174F is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz and is around 42% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD EPYC 9174F is around 49% faster in single-thread testing. Also, AMD EPYC 9174F uses around 44% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 31 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9174F | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP5 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Up to 4.4 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 28 (Threads: 56) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
| Cache | L1: 64KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 39MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
| TDP | 205W | 320W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $58.40 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2020 | Q2 2023 | |
| # of Samples | 3 | 28 | |
| CPU Rank | 374 | 218 | |
| CPU Value | 27.0 | 23.6 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2192(-33.0%) | 3269(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 37774(-29.7%) | 53721(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz | 37,774 | |
| AMD EPYC 9174F | 53,721 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz | 27.0 | |
| AMD EPYC 9174F | 23.6 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz | 2,192 | |
| AMD EPYC 9174F | 3,269 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz | AMD EPYC 9174F | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 205W | 320W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |