Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz is newer than Apple A11 Bionic and is around -9% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz is around 13% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 2906 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Apple A11 Bionic | ×Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | FCBGA1338 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | Up to 2.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 6 (Threads: 6) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | NA2 | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 4MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 10W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $1.83 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2021 | Q2 2021 | |
# of Samples | 2295 | 611 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 13.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1331(-11.4%) | 1502(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 4429(0.0%) | 4023(-9.2%) |
Apple A11 Bionic | 4,429 | |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | 4,023 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Apple A11 Bionic | NA | |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | 13.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Apple A11 Bionic | 1,331 | |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | 1,502 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Apple A11 Bionic | Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 10W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |