Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The CentaurHauls @2500MHz is newer than Intel Core i3-10100F @ 3.60GHz and is around -8% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The CentaurHauls @2500MHz is around -46% slower in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 2471 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×CentaurHauls @2500MHz | ×Intel Core i3-10100F @ 3.60GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
$66.6 - BUY
| |
| Socket Type | NA2 | FCLGA1200 | |
| CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | NA2 | Up to 4.3 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 8) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
| Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 16MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 6MB | |
| TDP | NA2 | 65W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | NA | $11.86 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2022 | Q4 2020 | |
| # of Samples | 10 | 2461 | |
| CPU Rank | 1796 | 1711 | |
| CPU Value | 0.0 | 130.9 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1381(-46.5%) | 2581(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 8014(-8.1%) | 8717(0.0%) |
| CentaurHauls @2500MHz | 8,014 | |
| Intel Core i3-10100F @ 3.60GHz | 8,717 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| CentaurHauls @2500MHz | NA | |
| Intel Core i3-10100F @ 3.60GHz | 130.9 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| CentaurHauls @2500MHz | 1,381 | |
| Intel Core i3-10100F @ 3.60GHz | 2,581 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| CentaurHauls @2500MHz | Intel Core i3-10100F @ 3.60GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | NA | 65W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |