Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 is newer than Intel Core Duo T2400 @ 1.83GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 is around 38% faster in single-thread testing. Also, AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 uses around 12% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 438 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 | ×Intel Core Duo T2400 @ 1.83GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | S1 | BGA479 | |
| CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
| Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, | L1: 128KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
| TDP | 35W | 31W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $5.66 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2009 | Q1 2009 | |
| # of Samples | 132 | 306 | |
| CPU Rank | 4802 | 5134 | |
| CPU Value | 43.6 | 22.9 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 7313(0.0%) | 5323(-27.3%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 652(0.0%) | 366(-43.9%) |
| AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 | 652 | |
| Intel Core Duo T2400 @ 1.83GHz | 366 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 | 43.6 | |
| Intel Core Duo T2400 @ 1.83GHz | 22.9 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 | 731 | |
| Intel Core Duo T2400 @ 1.83GHz | 532 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 | Intel Core Duo T2400 @ 1.83GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 35W | 31W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |