Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9354P is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD EPYC 9354P is around 21% faster in single-thread testing. Also, AMD EPYC 9354P uses around 31% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 33 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9354P | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP5 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.4 GHz | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 32 (Threads: 64) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
| Cache | L1: 2,560KB, L2: 40.0MB, L3: 48MB | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
| TDP | 205W | 280W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $51.10 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2022 | Q1 2023 | |
| # of Samples | 5 | 28 | |
| CPU Rank | 252 | 96 | |
| CPU Value | 17.6 | 32.7 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2287(-17.4%) | 2769(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 48916(-34.5%) | 74626(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | 48,916 | |
| AMD EPYC 9354P | 74,626 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | 17.6 | |
| AMD EPYC 9354P | 32.7 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | 2,287 | |
| AMD EPYC 9354P | 2,769 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6314U @ 2.30GHz | AMD EPYC 9354P | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 205W | 280W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |