Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The ZHAOXIN Z3-6540M@2.1+GHz is newer than AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core and is around -22% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The ZHAOXIN Z3-6540M@2.1+GHz is around -25% slower in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 520 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×ZHAOXIN Z3-6540M@2.1+GHz | ×AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | AM2+ | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.6 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 16.0MB, | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 2MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $17.34 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2024 | Q4 2008 | |
# of Samples | 6 | 514 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 44.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 690(-24.6%) | 915(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1378(-22.2%) | 1771(0.0%) |
ZHAOXIN Z3-6540M@2.1+GHz | 1,378 | |
AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core | 1,771 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
ZHAOXIN Z3-6540M@2.1+GHz | NA | |
AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core | 44.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
ZHAOXIN Z3-6540M@2.1+GHz | 690 | |
AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core | 915 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
ZHAOXIN Z3-6540M@2.1+GHz | AMD Phenom 9650 Quad-Core | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |