Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz and is around -5% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz is around -23% slower in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 461 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
$249 - BUY
| |
| Socket Type | NA2 | LGA 2011 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | NA2 | 3.3 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | NA2 | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 16) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
| Cache | NA2 | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 25MB | |
| TDP | NA2 | 130W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | NA | $23.73 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2024 | Q1 2014 | |
| # of Samples | 1 | 460 | |
| CPU Value | 0.0 | 48.9 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1554(-22.9%) | 2015(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 11519(-5.5%) | 12184(0.0%) |
| ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz | 11,519 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz | 12,184 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz | NA | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz | 48.9 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz | 1,554 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz | 2,015 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 @ 3.30GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | NA | 130W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |