Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz and is around -8% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz is around -23% slower in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 120 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
$3495 - BUY
| |
| Socket Type | NA2 | LGA2011-v3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | NA2 | 3.2 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | NA2 | Up to 3.6 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 16) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
| Cache | NA2 | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 20MB | |
| TDP | NA2 | 135W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | NA | $24.64 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2024 | Q4 2014 | |
| # of Samples | 1 | 119 | |
| CPU Value | 0.0 | 3.6 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1554(-22.5%) | 2006(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 11519(-7.7%) | 12474(0.0%) |
| ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz | 11,519 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz | 12,474 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz | NA | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz | 3.6 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz | 1,554 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz | 2,006 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| ARM Neoverse-V1 16 Core 0 MHz | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | NA | 135W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |