Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron E3200 @ 2.40GHz is newer than AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 Dual Core also around 21% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 7% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron E3200 @ 2.40GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 144 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 Dual Core | ×Intel Celeron E3200 @ 2.40GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | 939 | LGA775 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 110W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $20.08 | $11.86 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2009 | Q3 2009 | |
# of Samples | 27 | 117 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 45.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 9123(-7.1%) | 9813(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 709(-21.2%) | 900(0.0%) |
AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 Dual Core | 709 | |
Intel Celeron E3200 @ 2.40GHz | 900 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 Dual Core | NA | |
Intel Celeron E3200 @ 2.40GHz | 45.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 Dual Core | 912 | |
Intel Celeron E3200 @ 2.40GHz | 981 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 Dual Core | Intel Celeron E3200 @ 2.40GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 110W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |