Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is newer than Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. It is also significantly faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core Ultra 9 285K uses around 27% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 4396 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | ×Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$559.99 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1851 | LGA775 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.7 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.7 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 24) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 2,432KB, L2: 40.0MB, L3: 36MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 125W | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $17.34 | |
Other | Intel Graphics | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2024 | Q4 2008 | |
# of Samples | 2573 | 1823 | |
CPU Value | 121.0 | 13.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 5094(0.0%) | 1283(-74.8%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 67731(0.0%) | 2495(-96.3%) |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 67,731 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | 2,495 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 121.0 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | 13.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 5,094 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | 1,283 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |