Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is newer than Intel Core i9-13900E and is around -14% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285H is around 34% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core i9-13900E uses around 36% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1380 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | ×Intel Core i9-13900E | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCBGA2049 | FCLGA1700 | |
| CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
| Clockspeed | 2.9 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 5.4 GHz | Up to 5.2 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 16) | 24 (Threads: 32) | |
| Cache | L1: 1,632KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 24MB | L1: 2,176KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 36MB | |
| TDP | 45W | 65W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $8.21 | $11.86 | |
| Other | Intel Arc 140T GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | |
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2025 | Q3 2023 | |
| # of Samples | 1244 | 136 | |
| CPU Rank | 407 | 334 | |
| CPU Value | 52.9 | 72.7 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 4472(0.0%) | 3345(-25.2%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 34461(-14.5%) | 40303(0.0%) |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 34,461 | |
| Intel Core i9-13900E | 40,303 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 52.9 | |
| Intel Core i9-13900E | 72.7 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | 4,472 | |
| Intel Core i9-13900E | 3,345 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Core i9-13900E | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 45W | 65W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |