Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9275F is newer than AMD EPYC 9374F is around 22% faster in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 24 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×AMD EPYC 9275F | ×AMD EPYC 9374F | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | SP5 | SP5 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 4.1 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 4.5 GHz | Up to 4.3 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
| Cache | L1: 1,920KB, L2: 24.0MB, L3: 256MB | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
| TDP | 320W | 320W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $58.40 | $58.40 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2025 | Q1 2023 | |
| # of Samples | 5 | 19 | |
| CPU Value | 24.6 | 23.5 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 3810(0.0%) | 3135(-17.7%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 84621(0.0%) | 82009(-3.1%) |
| AMD EPYC 9275F | 84,621 | |
| AMD EPYC 9374F | 82,009 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| AMD EPYC 9275F | 24.6 | |
| AMD EPYC 9374F | 23.5 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| AMD EPYC 9275F | 3,810 | |
| AMD EPYC 9374F | 3,135 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| AMD EPYC 9275F | AMD EPYC 9374F | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 320W | 320W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |