Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
Both CPUs were released (or first benchmaked) within the last year, but AMD EPYC 9755 is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. It is also significantly faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 3 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon Platinum 8260C @ 2.40GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9755 | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP5 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 4.1 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 128 (Threads: 256) | |
| Cache | NA2 | L1: 10,160KB, L2: 127.0MB, L3: 512MB | |
| TDP | NA2 | 500W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | NA | $91.25 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2025 | Q2 2025 | |
| # of Samples | 1 | 2 | |
| CPU Value | 0.0 | 12.8 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2203(-37.1%) | 3503(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 34420(-79.3%) | 166328(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8260C @ 2.40GHz | 34,420 | |
| AMD EPYC 9755 | 166,328 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8260C @ 2.40GHz | NA | |
| AMD EPYC 9755 | 12.8 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8260C @ 2.40GHz | 2,203 | |
| AMD EPYC 9755 | 3,503 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8260C @ 2.40GHz | AMD EPYC 9755 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | NA | 500W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |