Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz is newer than Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz is around 42% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz uses substantially less power. The CPUs selected in this comparison belong in different CPU Classes: Desktop, Laptop. Consider, selecting CPUs from simliar CPU Class for more apt comparison. The values below were tabulated from a combined 6154 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz | ×Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
$256.7 - BUY
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA2011 | FCBGA1440 | |
| CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop | |
| Clockspeed | 3.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 4.5 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 6 (Threads: 12) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
| Cache | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 15MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
| TDP | 130W | 45W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $23.73 | $8.21 | |
| Other | Intel UHD Graphics | ||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2011 | Q1 2020 | |
| # of Samples | 706 | 5448 | |
| CPU Rank | 1742 | 1771 | |
| CPU Value | 32.8 | 32.8 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1774(-29.7%) | 2523(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 8409(0.0%) | 8194(-2.6%) |
| Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz | 8,409 | |
| Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz | 8,194 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz | 32.8 | |
| Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz | 32.8 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz | 1,774 | |
| Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz | 2,523 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core i7-3960X @ 3.30GHz | Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 130W | 45W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |