Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz is newer than Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz and is around 7% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz is around 13% faster in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1324 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz | ×Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | PLGA775 | LGA775 | |
| CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clockspeed | 1.9 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
| Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
| TDP | 65W | 65W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $11.86 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2008 | Q1 2009 | |
| # of Samples | 258 | 1066 | |
| CPU Rank | 4799 | 4730 | |
| CPU Value | 18.1 | 25.8 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 717(-11.7%) | 8123(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 724(-6.4%) | 774(0.0%) |
| Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz | 724 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz | 774 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz | 18.1 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz | 25.8 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz | 717 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz | 812 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Duo E6320 @ 1.86GHz | Intel Core2 Duo E6400 @ 2.13GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 65W | 65W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |