Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core2 Duo E8235 @ 2.80GHz is newer than Intel Core2 Extreme X9100 @ 3.06GHz and is around -14% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core2 Duo E8235 @ 2.80GHz is around -7% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core2 Duo E8235 @ 2.80GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 137 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core2 Duo E8235 @ 2.80GHz | ×Intel Core2 Extreme X9100 @ 3.06GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | Socket P | PGA478 | |
| CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
| Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
| TDP | NA2 | 44W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | NA | $8.03 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2009 | Q4 2008 | |
| # of Samples | 24 | 113 | |
| CPU Rank | 4368 | 4180 | |
| CPU Value | 0.0 | 1.4 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 11123(-6.5%) | 1190(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1020(-14.5%) | 1193(0.0%) |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8235 @ 2.80GHz | 1,020 | |
| Intel Core2 Extreme X9100 @ 3.06GHz | 1,193 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8235 @ 2.80GHz | NA | |
| Intel Core2 Extreme X9100 @ 3.06GHz | 1.4 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8235 @ 2.80GHz | 1,112 | |
| Intel Core2 Extreme X9100 @ 3.06GHz | 1,190 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8235 @ 2.80GHz | Intel Core2 Extreme X9100 @ 3.06GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | NA | 44W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |