Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 is newer than Intel Core2 Duo SL9400 @ 1.86GHz and is around -9% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 is around -8% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core2 Duo SL9400 @ 1.86GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 316 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core2 Duo SL9400 @ 1.86GHz | ×AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | BGA956 | S1 | |
| CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clockspeed | 1.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
| Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, | |
| TDP | 17W | 35W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $3.10 | $6.39 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2009 | Q2 2009 | |
| # of Samples | 184 | 132 | |
| CPU Rank | 4794 | 4886 | |
| CPU Value | 2.8 | 43.6 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 7913(0.0%) | 7313(-7.6%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 720(0.0%) | 652(-9.3%) |
| Intel Core2 Duo SL9400 @ 1.86GHz | 720 | |
| AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 | 652 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Duo SL9400 @ 1.86GHz | 2.8 | |
| AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 | 43.6 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Duo SL9400 @ 1.86GHz | 791 | |
| AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 | 731 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Duo SL9400 @ 1.86GHz | AMD Turion X2 Dual-Core Mobile RM-74 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 17W | 35W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |