iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Hisilicon Kirin9000 vs Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.

×Hisilicon Kirin9000×Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed3.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartNANA
# of Samples326
Single Thread Rating24451803
CPU Mark49894579
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 3rd of December 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Hisilicon Kirin9000
4,989
Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350
4,579
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 3rd of December 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Hisilicon Kirin9000
2,445
Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350
1,803

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Hisilicon Kirin9000Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.